On Mar 4, 7:10 pm, Brent Meeker <meeke...@dslextreme.com> wrote:
> Collapse "appears" to instruments as well as people - that's why we can
> shared records of experiments and agree on them. I'm not sure what you
> mean by "account for" collapse. At least one interpretation of QM,
> advocated by Peres, Fuchs, and Omnes for example, is that the "collapse"
> is purely epistemological. All that changes is our knowledge or model
> of the state and QM merely predicts probabilities for this change.
Such epistemological theories need to be carefully distinguished from
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to email@example.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
For more options, visit this group at