On 02 Jul 2011, at 16:53, Stephen Paul King wrote:
Could you elaborate a bit more on the part where you say
"...self-speeding up abilities to the machine with respect to the
most probable continuation/universal-machine"? What defines the
The universal dovetailing, or equivalently the true sigma_ sentences
and their proofs, and relative proof. This follows from the UD argument.
The logic of "probability one" can already be characterized by the
logic of the "arithmetical quantization" BDp with p a Sigma_1
propositions. It gives an arithmetical non boolean sort of quantum
logic.I think that if you search on the name of "Goldblatt" in the
archive you might find longer explanation that I have already given to
you on this, if I remember well.
I am just translating a problem in philosophy/theology into a problem
in math by using the comp hypothesis to justify the use of computer
science and mathematical logic.
I have taken a look at the Steve Vickers slides you pointed too. It is
rather complex and does not seem related to comp in an easy way. It it
can be related at all, it has to be related through the S4Grz1
("universal soul, the "pure" first person") and X1* ("universal
feeler") arithmetical points of view.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
For more options, visit this group at