On Sun, Aug 7, 2011 at 1:35 AM, John Mikes <jami...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Stasthis,
> let me barge in with one fundamental - not dispersing my reply into those
> (many and long) details:
> As I read your comments/replies (and I agree with your position within the
> limits I want to expose here), I have the feeling that you agree with the
> rest of the combatants in considering 'the brain', our idea about
> 'intelligence' and 'consciousness' as complete and total. I argue that it is
> not. Upon historic reminiscence all such inventory about these (and many
> more) concepts has been growing by addition and by phasing out imaginary
> 'content'   as we 'learn', - an ongoing process that does not seem to have
> reached the ultimate end/completion.
> So you are right in considering whatever we new yesterday (my substitution
> for today) but not including what we may know tomorrow. Drawing conclusions
> upon incomplete inventory  does not seem acceptable.

We have to do our best with the information we have, don't we?

-- 
Stathis Papaioannou

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.

Reply via email to