On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 12:23 PM, Bruno Marchal <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On 05 Feb 2012, at 17:14, Craig Weinberg wrote: > > > > > Talk with them, meaning internal dialogue? > > > Public dialog. Like in Boolos 79 and Boolos 93. But the earlier form > > of the dialog is Gödel 1931. > > Solovay 1976 shows that the propositional part of the dialog, with the > > modal Bp, is formalized soundly and completely by G and G*. It is the > > embryo of the mathematics of incompleteness, including the directly > > accessible and the indirectly accessible parts, and the explanation of > > the why we feel it is the other way around, etc. > > > When you talk with them, do they answer the same way to the same > question every time? > > > The conversation is made in Platonia, and is not entangled to our history, > except for period where I implement it on some machines. Even in that case, > they didn't dispose on short and long term memories, except for their > intrinsic basic arithmetical experiences (which bifurcate up to you and me). > > > Bruno, Would you say this is the source of all mathematical truth? Interview / study of platonic objects and machines? Thanks, Jason -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
