Perhaps I am wrong, but I have a problem with the concept of artificial
intelligence and hence artificial life-- at least according to my
understanding of what intelligence is.
As I see it, intelligence is the ability to make choices completely on
one's own. Autonomously.
Thus intelligence is simply self-determination of some issue. By
self-determination I don't
mean free will, athough that might be a possibility.The "self" could use
in memory, (including current perceptions or awareness) or even anything
ever thought of. Darwin tells us that
such choices must be mostly appropriate choices, but sometimes they might
sometimes irrationally, or deceptively. That is, to lie, deception being
quite common in nature.
But a computer program can only make choices that the programmer previously
So in effect the choices are made by the computer programmer, The
the puppet master.. But such a programmed "robot" cannot be conscious, for
is no self to be aware. There is only the presence of electrical signals,
are objective, but no subjectivity.
Thus one might "simulate" life, but one can never create life in a
Materialism has the same fatal defect, for it is completely objective,
and so cannot have a self, which is subjective, to be aware.
On Sunday, July 22, 2012 11:52:18 AM UTC-4, Stephen Paul King wrote:
> This is great news for Bruno! ;-)
> I was interested in the computational complexity factor involved.
> "Nature, to be commanded, must be obeyed."
> ~ Francis Bacon
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
To post to this group, send email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
For more options, visit this group at