Hi John Clark The difference is that a computer has no intelligence, cannot deal with qualia, and is not alive.
My brain has all of these features in spades. ibniz would say, "If there's no God, we'd have to invent him so that everything could function." ----- Receiving the following content ----- From: John Clark Receiver: everything-list Time: 2012-09-13, 13:15:54 Subject: Re: imaginary numbers in comp On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 12:11 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote: > I reject comp, because it cannot access feelings or qualities And you have deduced this by using the "nothing but" fallacy: even the largest computer is "nothing but" a collection of on and off switches. Never mind that your brain is "nothing but" a collection of molecules rigorously obeying the laws of physics. ? John K Clark ? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
