On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 2:02 PM, Craig Weinberg <whatsons...@gmail.com>wrote:
> I know you don't have a proof of the Goldbach Conjecture. Well OK, I
>> don't know that with absolute certainty, maybe you have a proof but are
>> keeping it secret for some strange reason, but my knowledge is more than
>> diddly squat because I very strongly suspect you have no such proof and I'm
>> probably right. But I do know for certain that you don't have a valid proof
>> that 2+2=5 or a way to directly detect consciousness in any mind other than
>> your own.
> Then you are claiming to know about "our consciousness" instead of just
> your own.
I am claiming that you don't possess a valid proof that 2+2=5 because there
is no such proof to possess.
> >>> Let's see how computer fares under a giant junkyard magnet.
>> >> Let's see how you fare in a junkyard car crusher.
> > translation - "I concede, I have no argument."
So lets see, "a giant junkyard magnet" is a devastating logical argument
but "a junkyard car crusher" is not. Explain to me how that works.
John K Clark
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
For more options, visit this group at