On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 2:02 PM, Craig Weinberg <whatsons...@gmail.com>wrote:
> > > I know you don't have a proof of the Goldbach Conjecture. Well OK, I >> don't know that with absolute certainty, maybe you have a proof but are >> keeping it secret for some strange reason, but my knowledge is more than >> diddly squat because I very strongly suspect you have no such proof and I'm >> probably right. But I do know for certain that you don't have a valid proof >> that 2+2=5 or a way to directly detect consciousness in any mind other than >> your own. >> > > Then you are claiming to know about "our consciousness" instead of just > your own. > I am claiming that you don't possess a valid proof that 2+2=5 because there is no such proof to possess. > >>> Let's see how computer fares under a giant junkyard magnet. >>> >> >> >> Let's see how you fare in a junkyard car crusher. >> > > > translation - "I concede, I have no argument." > So lets see, "a giant junkyard magnet" is a devastating logical argument but "a junkyard car crusher" is not. Explain to me how that works. John K Clark -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
