John,
Are you on this list to learn or to argue?
Jason
On Oct 29, 2012, at 12:58 PM, John Clark <[email protected]> wrote:
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 1:21 PM, Bruno Marchal <[email protected]>
wrote:
>> We know that as well as we know anything about physics
> This is not valid.
NOT A VALID POINT?!
> A priori we can be dreaming in some world based on a different
physics. Or, as with comp we might belong only to sophisticated
computations,
Are you seriously suggesting that we trash our physics textbooks and
it doesn't bother you if one of your statements does not correspond
to physical experiments??
2) the Platonist one, in which the physical reality is the border,
or the shadow of a vaster invisible reality.
If it's in shadow then it can't be seen so there is nothing to be
gained by talking about it.
>> we were talking about the theoretical feasibility of making a
prediction and making a forecast of yesterday's weather is not of
much use.
> No. We were talking on something else.
I was talking about it, I don't know what you were talking about.
John K Clark
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]
.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en
.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
