On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 10:40 AM, meekerdb <meeke...@verizon.net> wrote:
> On 11/7/2012 1:14 AM, Jason Resch wrote:
>> But it's hard to see what 1/pi of a duplicate would be.
> I am not sure I understand what you mean. Where do you get 1/Pi from? What
> is your point?
> That QM predicts probabilities other than 1/2, 1/3, 2/3 and other simple
> fractions. So an interpretation of the Born rule in terms of 'duplications'
> can require arbitrarily many 'duplications' in a single measurement; as when
> the probability is a transcendental number.
Well that is a problem for quantum physicists. Not for poker players. :-)
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
For more options, visit this group at