On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 10:40 AM, meekerdb <meeke...@verizon.net> wrote: > On 11/7/2012 1:14 AM, Jason Resch wrote: >> >> But it's hard to see what 1/pi of a duplicate would be. > > > I am not sure I understand what you mean. Where do you get 1/Pi from? What > is your point? > > > That QM predicts probabilities other than 1/2, 1/3, 2/3 and other simple > fractions. So an interpretation of the Born rule in terms of 'duplications' > can require arbitrarily many 'duplications' in a single measurement; as when > the probability is a transcendental number. >
Well that is a problem for quantum physicists. Not for poker players. :-) Jason -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
