On Monday, January 14, 2013 12:11:58 PM UTC-5, yanniru wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 11:39 AM, Bruno Marchal > <[email protected]<javascript:>> > wrote: > > > > On 13 Jan 2013, at 05:34, Richard Ruquist wrote: > > >>> That's because they don't consider that matter is inherently > sensitive. > > > I do. In my model of reality all matter is full of sensitive monads, > Calabi-Yau Compact Manifolds, > each perceiving all other monads instantly, > as in "indra's net of jewels" in buddhism. > > > I agree more or less, although it gets difficult as such a distant and primitive level of description to say whether it is a literal net of monads or a monadic theater projecting stories in a net-like distribution of perspectives. I tend to think that electromagnetism is the process by which atoms generate spacetime and divide from each other rather than impulses or waves which travel through spacetime.
Craig -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/everything-list/-/I_qTpJGawd4J. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
