On Monday, January 14, 2013 12:11:58 PM UTC-5, yanniru wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 11:39 AM, Bruno Marchal 
> <mar...@ulb.ac.be<javascript:>> 
> wrote: 
> > 
> > On 13 Jan 2013, at 05:34, Richard Ruquist wrote: 
> >>> That's because they don't consider that matter is inherently 
> sensitive. 
> I do. In my model of reality all matter is full of sensitive monads, 
> Calabi-Yau Compact Manifolds, 
> each perceiving all other monads instantly, 
> as in "indra's net of jewels" in buddhism. 
> I agree more or less, although it gets difficult as such a distant and 
primitive level of description to say whether it is a literal net of monads 
or a monadic theater projecting stories in a net-like distribution of 
perspectives. I tend to think that electromagnetism is the process by which 
atoms generate spacetime and divide from each other rather than impulses or 
waves which travel through spacetime.


You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
For more options, visit this group at 

Reply via email to