On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 10:29 AM, Bruno Marchal <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 14 Jan 2013, at 18:11, Richard Ruquist wrote: > >> On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 11:39 AM, Bruno Marchal <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 13 Jan 2013, at 05:34, Richard Ruquist wrote: >>>>> >>>>> That's because they don't consider that matter is inherently sensitive. >> >> >> >> I do. In my model of reality all matter is full of sensitive monads, >> Calabi-Yau Compact Manifolds, >> each perceiving all other monads instantly, > > > How? And where does the Calabi-Yau CM come from?
That is just simple string theory. You know that don't you? > > It seems to me that perception is a process (unlike consciousness, despite > strong relation). As a "physical" process, it can't be simultaneous. Here i was making a pun with the perception of Liebniz's monads who claim to be able to perceive the entire universe however with some fuzziness. I could have well used the reflection of all the jewels in Indras pearls or the 1/r mapping of the Calabi-Yau Compact manifolds. I agree that perception is a algorithmic process. We apparently disagree on how simultaneous the process can be. I claim instant processing based on it being a frictionless BEC where thoughts are instantaneous. Richard > > Bruno > > > > >> as in "indra's net of jewels" in buddhism. > > > > > > http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/ > > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Everything List" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
