On 15 Jan 2013, at 16:24, Richard Ruquist wrote:
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 8:53 AM, Bruno Marchal <[email protected]>
wrote:
What do you mean by "quantum mind"?
keep in mind that with comp we cannot assume the quantum. It is has
to be
derived from the "digital seen from inside".
And I am not sure we can choose the computations we are in, no more
than
choosing our parents.
Bruno
If the arithmetic computations
do not predict/derive
quantum mechanics,
they are not pertinent.
You are right.
But UDA shows that if comp is correct, and QM is correct, then the
second has to be a mathematical consequence of the first.
So, let us derive the physics from comp, and then we can compare with
nature. If nature refutes comp, then we have learned something, but up
to now, thanks to QM, the two physics fits well.
Bruno
The antropic principle of computations.
Richard
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]
.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en
.
http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
