On 15 Jan 2013, at 16:24, Richard Ruquist wrote:

## Advertising

On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 8:53 AM, Bruno Marchal <marc...@ulb.ac.be>wrote:What do you mean by "quantum mind"?keep in mind that with comp we cannot assume the quantum. It is hasto bederived from the "digital seen from inside".And I am not sure we can choose the computations we are in, no morethanchoosing our parents. BrunoIf the arithmetic computations do not predict/derive quantum mechanics, they are not pertinent.

You are right.

`But UDA shows that if comp is correct, and QM is correct, then the`

`second has to be a mathematical consequence of the first.`

`So, let us derive the physics from comp, and then we can compare with`

`nature. If nature refutes comp, then we have learned something, but up`

`to now, thanks to QM, the two physics fits well.`

Bruno

The antropic principle of computations. Richard --You received this message because you are subscribed to the GoogleGroups "Everything List" group.To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.

http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.