Brent,

I think you may be reading my question in the wrong way.  I didn't mean to
equate your consciousness with that of every if/else decision you make, but
rather ask something like, "What does the shortest possible program that is
conscious look like?"

I have trouble seeing why some short piece of code like:

if (x > 0) then do y() else do z();

Is not conscious of some property of x (whether it is positive or
negative), at least when the two different functions y() and z() cause the
program to enter different states.

I find it harder to justify the consciousness of a program that did not do
any selection, distinction, or inspection.  In most programming languages,
this is done using a conditional statement, such as an "if statement", a
"while statement" or a "switch statement".

Jason
***
Hi Jason,

   What plays the role of the abstract/platonic equation "if (x > 0) then
do y() else do z();" such that there is an actual referent to be conscious
of? Consciousness is consciousness of ...


On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 5:18 PM, Jason Resch <[email protected]> wrote:

>
>
>
> On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 3:09 PM, meekerdb <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> On 5/2/2013 7:47 AM, Jason Resch wrote:
>>
>>> Would anyone here say that a conditional (e.g., "if/else") statement"
>>> (in some program) is conscious?
>>>
>>
>> I don't think so.  We make if/else choices subconsciously all the time.
>>  My introspection tells me that conscious thought is a kind of narrative
>> story I construct.  I think the function of this is to condense my
>> experience for memory and future reference when I need to plan or predict
>> based on my past experience.  If I were designing an intelligent Mars Rover
>> that had to learn to deal with a wide variety of problems which I cannot
>> anticipate, this sort of selective memory narrative would be one component
>> of it's learning.
>>
>> Of course there are different levels of consciousness.  A Mars Rover
>> needs a conception of "self" as being in certain place, having completed
>> certain tasks, having certain capabilities, etc.  But it doesn't need to
>> consider its status among peers or reflect on its own computational methods
>> or its ultimate end.
>>
>> Brent
>>
>>
> Brent,
>
> I think you may be reading my question in the wrong way.  I didn't mean to
> equate your consciousness with that of every if/else decision you make, but
> rather ask something like, "What does the shortest possible program that is
> conscious look like?"
>
> I have trouble seeing why some short piece of code like:
>
> if (x > 0) then do y() else do z();
>
> Is not conscious of some property of x (whether it is positive or
> negative), at least when the two different functions y() and z() cause the
> program to enter different states.
>
> I find it harder to justify the consciousness of a program that did not do
> any selection, distinction, or inspection.  In most programming languages,
> this is done using a conditional statement, such as an "if statement", a
> "while statement" or a "switch statement".
>
> Jason
>
>
>
>>
>>
>>> I think such statements may form the atoms of consciousness, as they
>>> represent the point at which a program's behavior diverges based on the
>>> inspection of some information.
>>>
>>> Conditional statements are required for any kind of intelligent or
>>> responsive behavior, which might be why consciousness correlates with it.
>>>
>>> Jason
>>>
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Everything List" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to 
>> everything-list+unsubscribe@**googlegroups.com<everything-list%[email protected]>
>> .
>>
>> To post to this group, send email to 
>> everything-list@googlegroups.**com<[email protected]>
>> .
>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/**
>> group/everything-list?hl=en<http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en>
>> .
>> For more options, visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/**groups/opt_out<https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out>
>> .
>>
>>
>>
>  --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the
> Google Groups "Everything List" group.
> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/everything-list/K7E-Vfwj4QU/unsubscribe?hl=en
> .
> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to
> [email protected].
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to