On 6/30/2013 8:09 PM, Jason Resch wrote:
On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 2:00 AM, meekerdb <meeke...@verizon.net
On 6/29/2013 6:34 AM, spudboy...@aol.com <mailto:spudboy...@aol.com> wrote:
With regard to your's and Brents' coments, how would we demonstarte string
A super-giant CERN hadron collider?
No. You don't demonstrate physics models, you makes some predictions and
are turn out to be true the you give some credence to the theory. String
the same problem as Bruno's theory, it apparently predicts far too much.
Too much according to which standard? In my opinion, present "monouniverse" theories
predict far too little in my as we are founded by mysteries like the cosmological
constant having to be tuned to 120 decimal places.
Yes, such "everything" theories provide cheap explanation, but no prediction. In fact the
holographic principle indicates the CC need not be "fine tuned" at all.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
To post to this group, send email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.