On 11 Jul 2013, at 18:46, meekerdb wrote:
On 7/10/2013 11:25 PM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
I have given the equation. I try to explain this on FOAR but it
relies on some familiarity in logic.
Normally you should know already that physics is given by a measure
on relative computational continuations, and the logic explains
already the statistical interferences.
QM is deterministic and there is only one 'computational
continuation';
?
If you measure up+down in the base {up,down}, you get two
computational continuation, unless you add a non deterministic collapse.
so it's not clear to me how comp reproduces (or approximates?) this.
Those two computations exists already in arithmetic.
Nor do I see what you mean by statistical interferences. QM is a
theory in complex Hilbert space; do you refer to the interference of
amplitudes in Feynman path integrals?
No, I refer to the FPI, which when see by the machine itself in
arithmetic appears to obey to a quantum logic, which allows
interference between alternative realities.
Bruno
Brent
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
