On 11 Jul 2013, at 18:46, meekerdb wrote:
On 7/10/2013 11:25 PM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
I have given the equation. I try to explain this on FOAR but it
relies on some familiarity in logic.
Normally you should know already that physics is given by a measure
on relative computational continuations, and the logic explains
already the statistical interferences.
QM is deterministic and there is only one 'computational
continuation';
?
If you measure up+down in the base {up,down}, you get two
computational continuation, unless you add a non deterministic collapse.
so it's not clear to me how comp reproduces (or approximates?) this.
Those two computations exists already in arithmetic.
Nor do I see what you mean by statistical interferences. QM is a
theory in complex Hilbert space; do you refer to the interference of
amplitudes in Feynman path integrals?
No, I refer to the FPI, which when see by the machine itself in
arithmetic appears to obey to a quantum logic, which allows
interference between alternative realities.
Bruno
Brent
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
send an email to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
