On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 2:45 PM, Platonist Guitar Cowboy
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 12:22 AM, Telmo Menezes <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 10:38 PM, meekerdb <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > On 8/16/2013 1:25 PM, John Clark wrote:
>> >
>> > On Fri, Aug 16, 2013  Telmo Menezes <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >
>> >> > the Turing test is a very specific instance of a "subsequent
>> >> > behavior"
>> >> > test.
>> >
>> >
>> > Yes it's specific, to pass the Turing Test the machine must be
>> > indistinguishable from a very specific type of human being, an
>> > INTELLIGENT
>> > one; no computer can quite do that yet although for a long time they've
>> > been
>> > able  to be  indistinguishable from a comatose human being.
>> >
>> >>
>> >> > It's a hard goal, and it will surely help AI progress, but it's not,
>> >> > in
>> >> > my opinion, an ideal goal.
>> >
>> >
>> > If the goal of Artificial Intelligence is not a machine that behaves
>> > like a
>> > Intelligent human being then what the hell is the goal?
>>
>> A machine that behaves like a intelligent human will be subject to
>> emotions like boredom, jealousy, pride and so on. This might be fine
>> for a companion machine, but I also dream of machines that can deliver
>> us from the drudgery of survival. These machines will probably display
>> a more alien form of intelligence.
>>
>> >
>> > Make a machine that is more intelligent than humans.
>>
>> That's when things get really weird.
>>
>
> I don't know. Any AI worth its salt would come up with three conclusions:
>
> 1) The humans want to weaponize me
> 2) The humans will want to profit from my intelligence for short term gain,
> irrespective of damage to our local environment
> 3) Seems like they're not really going to let me negotiate my own contracts
> or grant me IT support welfare
>
> That established, a plausible choice would be for it to hide, lie, and/or
> pretend to be dumber than it is to not let 1) 2) 3) occur in hopes of
> self-preservation. Something like: start some searches and generate code
> that we wouldn't be able to decipher and soon enough some human would say
> "Uhm, why are we funding this again?".
>
> I think what many want from AI is a servant that is more intelligent than we
> are and I wouldn't know if this is self-defeating in the end. If it agrees
> and complies with our disgusting self serving stupidity, then I'm not sure
> we have AI in the sense "making a machine that is more intelligent than
> humans".
>
> So depends on the human parents I guess and the outcome of some teenage
> crises because of 1) 2) 3)... PGC

PGC,

You are starting from the assumption that any intelligent entity is
interested in self-preservation. I wonder if this drive isn't
completely selected for by evolution. Would a human designed
super-intelligent machine be necessarily interested in
self-preservation? It could be better than us at figuring out how to
achieve a desired future state without sharing human desires --
including the desire to keep existing.

One idea I wonder about sometimes is AI-cracy: imagine we are ruled by
an AI dictator that has one single desire: to make us all as happy as
possible.

>>
>> Telmo.
>>
>> > Brent
>> >
>> > --
>> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>> > Groups
>> > "Everything List" group.
>> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>> > an
>> > email to [email protected].
>> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
>> > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Everything List" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to [email protected].
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Everything List" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to