On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 2:01 PM, Quentin Anciaux <allco...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I said that if Russell Standish were duplicated then Russell Standish >> would be in Moscow and Washington. >> > > > This is only true from the POV of an external observer which is not > Russell Standish > Don't give me that pee pee POV bullshit, Russell Standish will see Moscow and Washington PERIOD. > both Russell will only feel from their *own* POV to be in one and only > one place (either washington or moscow). > How in the world does that conflict with my statement that Russell Standish would be in Moscow and Washington? It says so plain as day but for some reason people just keep ignoring the fact that RUSSELL STANDISH HAS BEEN DUPLICATED and keep on using pronouns like "I" and "he" just as they always have as if nothing unusual has happened. > that's the *main* point. > Yes, and I realized very early that if Bruno's main point was as worthless as that then there was no reason to keep reading his "proof". John K Clark -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
