*Yes - to the doctor?*  I was always kept aback from agreeing, because I
still believe to have included  M O R E  in my mind (brainfunctions, as you
say) then whatever that good doctor and his device may supply. So I
consider a mechanical substitution to the 'living' (what is it?)
capabilities a reduction in qualia and quanta. Unless "the doctor" is an
infinite universal machine...(still to have to meet one...)

JM


On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 3:10 PM, meekerdb <[email protected]> wrote:

>  On 12/11/2013 12:55 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
>
>  On 10 Dec 2013, at 20:20, George wrote:
>
>  Hi List
>
> I haven't contributed to this list for a while but I thought you might be
> interested in this article from the Science 
> Daily<http://www.sciencedaily.com/>on line magazine
>
> Neural Prosthesis Restores Behavior After Brain 
> Injury<http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/12/131209152259.htm>
>
>
>  Yes, things progress. Nice to hear of you George, best,
> Of course, we cannot test the first person experience of the rat. Even if
> the rat can talk, that would prove almost nothing, but the human will say
> "yes" to the doctor anyway, and without thinking to much on the theoretical
> consequences of the possible survival.
>
>
> But this brings up a difficulty I see in "comp".  We know that if the
> level of substitution is quantal, then we can't clone the state of the part
> being replaced (and in the UD model this corresponds to not knowing all the
> threads of computation through the state).  This wouldn't deter people from
> saying "yes" to the doctor.  But it implies that there will the a
> qualitative difference in consciousness, a "jump", perhaps like a memory
> gap and temporary disorientation due to concussion or drugs.  But then why
> doesn't some improbable quantum fluctuation prevent the part replacement
> and provide a more continuous path of consciousness, in analogy to quantum
> immortality?
>
> Brent
>
>
>  To stop comp to be *applied*, we should have made glasses illegal long
> ago ... Then we can argue that molecular biology confirms the use of comp
> by biological system all the time.
>
>
>  Bruno
>
>
>
>
>  George Levy
>
>
>  --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Everything List" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>
>
>   http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/
>
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Everything List" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>
>
>  --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Everything List" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to