On 28 December 2013 17:36, Stephen Paul King <[email protected]>wrote:
> Hi LizR, > > the relative time (as perceived by some imaginary third party) is > irrelevant. SO long as the interactions are synchronized correctly, lag is > irrelevant. Time is a measure of change of one element in a sequence to > another, the duration of the sequence is not relevant here unless we are > comparing measures of time. I am trying to figure out the method of > defining the measure. > Yeah, that's basically what I said. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
