On 3 January 2014 14:31, meekerdb <meeke...@verizon.net> wrote:
> Then I'll start by saying I don't reject MWI, I just have reservations
> about it, not so much that it's wrong, but that it doesn't really solve the
> problems it claims to - which implies criticism of the position that MWI
> has solved all the problems of interpreting QM. A lot of the above claimed
> advantages knocking down straw men built on naive interpretations of Bohr.
> Some are just assumptions, e.g that physics must be time reversible and
> I thought linearit was probabilities adding up to one, which isn't a
Time reversibility is an observed phenomenon in (almost) all particle
interactions, so surely not an assumption at all?
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
To post to this group, send email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.