On 14 Jan 2014, at 04:42, LizR wrote:
On 14 January 2014 16:38, Edgar L. Owen <[email protected]> wrote:
1. Existence must exist because non-existence cannot exist.
This sounds like St Anselm's ontological argument put into a nutshell.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ontological_argument
You are quite quick here. God existence is proved by Gödel by defining
God by the owner of all "positive" properties, and Gödel formalized
that in S5.
(I believe it falls down because existence isn't "a property that
something may or may not have"
OK.
although I'm willing to be corrected on that.)
That was correct.
bruno
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
send an email to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
