On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 6:46 PM, <[email protected]> wrote:

> Ok, speculatively jumping into the Tegmark book, which I am plodding
> through and his 4 levels of the multiverse, I need to throw out this
> question. Is it even possible, in principle, to physically traverse into
> another universe, a parallel universe, and then back again? I do not mran
> in the David Deutsch sense of performing cross cosmic quantum calculations,
> but directly, mollecularly, boots on the ground, traveling there and back
> again?
>
>
Molecularly, I'd say no, but consciously I'd say yes. If we froze you on
Earth, and then coincidentally Aliens 100 trillion ly away from us made an
exact version out of you out of matter they had on hand, and then they
thawed you, you would travel these 100 trillion ly. This journey is
impossible for matter or energy to make, impossible for anything physical,
yet your consciousness did it.  For the same reason, someone in an
altogether different physical universe could do the same thing and enable
you to travel there.  There would be no causal link, however, to whatever
memories you formed in that universe and whatever version of you we create
to unthaw and bring you back, it would be again an entire coincidence for
us to get it just right so the one we thaw matches the one the aliens in
the distant land decided to freeze.

In a sense, we are performing these traversals all the time, but only
between distant universes similar enough to the one we are in a moment
before, that we don't notice it.  You might be sitting there quietly in
Earth #313812031 one moment, then the next instant you are actually on
Earth #173119389 (which was an Earth that reappeared after 10^200 cyclical
big crunch and big bang cycles) from the moment you were just in.

Jason



> -----Original Message-----
> From: LizR <[email protected]>
> To: everything-list <[email protected]>
> Sent: Wed, Jan 15, 2014 7:33 pm
> Subject: Re: Tegmark's New Book
>
>
> On 16 January 2014 13:31, Edgar L. Owen &lt;[email protected]&gt; wrote:
> Stephen,
>
> c is actually the speed of TIME as the STc equation makes clear. It just
> so happens that light, having no velocity in time, always travels at the
> speed of time in all observers' frames thorough SPACE. All its spacetime
> velocity is only through space.
>
>
>
> The "speed of time" ?! Wow. Maybe I can interest you in writing for
> "Doctor Who".
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Everything List" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Everything List" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to