On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 10:11:50AM +0100, Bruno Marchal wrote:
> 
> 
> Comp does not need actual infinities, but it still needs the
> potential infinity of all finite things (integers, or something).
> 
> But finitist physicalism is indeed a way out of comp. But then your
> theory is non-computationalist. Do you say "no" to the doctor. You
> have already answer "no", and later "yes", so I am not sure. Which
> is it?
> 

I would agree that finitism contradicts comp, because it contradicts
arithmetic realism (some numbers are not as real as others), but why
do you suggest that finitism contradicts "Yes doctor"?


-- 

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Prof Russell Standish                  Phone 0425 253119 (mobile)
Principal, High Performance Coders
Visiting Professor of Mathematics      [email protected]
University of New South Wales          http://www.hpcoders.com.au
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to