On 8/3/2014 5:18 PM, Telmo Menezes wrote:



On Sun, Aug 3, 2014 at 7:50 PM, meekerdb <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    On 8/3/2014 9:04 AM, John Clark wrote:
    On Sat, Aug 2, 2014 at 2:20 PM, Bruno Marchal <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

        > Exactly what John Clark seems to miss, the first person 
after-experiences.


    Oh yes, that's because John Clark is a Zombie.

        > In both diaries, those who predicted 'no break of symmetry',


    Who in hell predicted no break of symmetry? One will see Moscow and one 
will not,
    nobody thinks that is symmetrical. If things were symmetrical there would 
only be
    one person regardless of how many bodies there were; there needs to be a 
break in
    symmetry for the concepts of "you" and "me" to be meaningful. You and I are 
two
    different people because things are unsymmetrical, we both have memories 
that the
    other does not; In the thought experiment things are a little more 
complicated
    because the Helsinki Man has no memories that the Moscow Man (or Washington 
Man)
    does not, but the Moscow Man DOES have memories the Helsinki Man does not, 
such as
    the memory of seeing Moscow.

    Bruno seems to have a theory, based on his salvia experience, that a person 
can
    exist independently of any memories.


Perhaps ironically, ISTM this is trivially true if you accept the conventional neuroscience hypothesis that consciousness emerges from brain activity. Then, there is some moment after birth when a baby becomes conscious. At that moment they form their first memory and exist as a conscious entity without any previous memories.

How do you know they don't first form a memory and then become conscious? Or more likely the person, in the sense of personality, doesn't not just come into being like switching on a light; rather they are built up by a combination of genetics and experiences.

    That's why he says things like, "We're all the same person."  I find this 
theory
    contrary to experience.


It cannot possibly be contrary to experience. Experience implies you-ness.

???  It doesn't imply sameness.

      I've had two relatives die of Alzheimers and they certainly did not seem 
to be the
    same person as when they could remember things.


Do you figure 5 year old Brent would appear to be the same person as present day Brent to an external observer? Yet you can probably remember being 5 year old Brent.

Exactly the sense in which I'm that person by continuity of memories. And in which I am not Telmo or Bruno.

Brent

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to