Is IIUC "If I Understand Correctly" ? (IIUC?)
On 21 August 2014 13:06, Russell Standish <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 09:42:22AM -0400, Richard Ruquist wrote: > > > > The requirement for observers in my mind makes comp equivalent to the > > Copenhagen Interpretation CI > > in the need for conscious observers and is falsified along with CI for > that > > reason. > > Richard > > > > I don't see this. 1p phenomenology in a Multiverse is equivalent to > Copenhagen in some sense. We have an appearance of wavefunction > collapse, for example. But why do you say that CI is falsified? It is > just an interpretation, and thus compatible with all empirical > evidence supporting quantum mechanics, IIUC. > > Cheers > > -- > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Prof Russell Standish Phone 0425 253119 (mobile) > Principal, High Performance Coders > Visiting Professor of Mathematics [email protected] > University of New South Wales http://www.hpcoders.com.au > > Latest project: The Amoeba's Secret > (http://www.hpcoders.com.au/AmoebasSecret.html) > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Everything List" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
