On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 3:11 AM, Bruno Marchal <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Educate yourself by reading the excellent book by Lawrence M Krauss "A >> Universe From Nothing: Why There Is Something Rather Than Nothing". >> > > > It assumes still enough physicalism so that he put still some magic in > the brain. > After looking at what you say above I very much doubt you have read the book by Krauss, or in fact read any book on cosmology written in the last 300 years; books by Plato or Aristotle don't count. >> You never said anything like that? On october 13 you said " But, wait, >> we don't know if there *is* a physical world". >> > > > In the context, it means a primary physical world. I insist enough of > that important distinction. > I know what I mean by "physical" but I don't know what you mean, but whatever you mean it has to explain why engineers need to make a "physical" computer to get any calculations done. > It is a weak version of comp > I don't care, I have zero interest in "comp". > > that is it is implied by all version of comp > Well good for "comp". > > think at the step 3 of the UDA. > And I'm not interested in what steps the Universal Dance Association recommends. John K Clark -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
