On Monday, May 11, 2015, Jason Resch <[email protected]> wrote:

>
>
> On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 1:24 AM, Bruno Marchal <[email protected]
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> wrote:
>
>>
>> On 08 May 2015, at 02:15, LizR wrote:
>>
>> Nicely summarised. I may have comments once I've had a chance to digest
>> your summary (and any subsequent comments).
>>
>> In the meantime, if you aren't familiar with Maudlin's "Olimpia" argument
>> that is also (possibly) relevant. It uses a similar form of argument to the
>> MGA to arrive at a different consclusion, namely that supervenience of
>> consciousness on a physical machine (brain, computer) isn't possible.
>>
>>
>>
>> But that is the same conclusion than MGA.
>> Both MGA and Maudlin shows that there is a serious difficulty in
>> maintaining both comp and the physical supervenience. Maudlin leans toward
>> abandoning comp, I keep comp and lean toward abandoning materialism. But
>> both show their incompatibility.
>>
>>
> Is the incompatibility here with supervenience on the instantaneous
> physical state, where state is only the positions and properties of
> particles absent how they got there or their history? If so then I can see
> how this is incompatible with computationalism, for it is like ascribing
> consciousness to bits on a tape in a turing machine, or the RAM in a laptop.
>
> However I think there is some confusion here, at least I am still confused
> about it, whether there is also a denial of supervenience of consciousness
> on physically-implemented computations. What do MGA / Olympia arguments say
> about the consciousness resulting from building an AI on a physical
> computer, or making a human with a physical brain? If it implements
> (physically) the right computations should it not be conscious? Is there
> some contention that a physical computation is not the same as some more
> fundamental arithmetical compuatation or do MGA / Olympia only aim to show
> some flaw with mind-brain identity theory?
>

If a computation can be physically implemented then it is also
"implemented" in Platonia, and so is any associated consciousness.


-- 
Stathis Papaioannou

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to