On 8 May 2015 at 14:04, Bruce Kellett <bhkell...@optusnet.com.au> wrote:
> > Which was rather my conclusion. Since the MGA is not a rigorous argument, > it was always of very limited utility -- it certainly is insufficient to > carry the weight of the conclusion that the physical substrate is > unnecessary for consciousness. I suggested several conclusions. Do you think any of them potentially carry any weight? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
