On 8 May 2015 at 14:04, Bruce Kellett <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Which was rather my conclusion. Since the MGA is not a rigorous argument, > it was always of very limited utility -- it certainly is insufficient to > carry the weight of the conclusion that the physical substrate is > unnecessary for consciousness. I suggested several conclusions. Do you think any of them potentially carry any weight? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
