On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 Quentin Anciaux <[email protected]> wrote: > > > So you're claiming that the probability of seeing spin up while doing a > measurement of the spin is one (likewise seeing spin down) right? > > That is neither right nor wrong because it is not clear what "the probability" refers to; the probability of *who* seeing spin up?
What I am claiming is that if the MWI is correct and if Quentin Anciaux performs a spin measurement on a electron then Quentin Anciaux will see spin up with 100% probability and Quentin Anciaux will see spin down with 100% probability. I am also claiming that if Quentin Anciaux measures the spin of a electron and I say "I bet Quentin Anciaux got spin up" I will win the bet 50% of the time. Again assuming that the MWI is correct. > > > Then, for one if you agree, you're just saying MWI is false, so you lied > to us for years saying the contrary, > > And likewise the probability of Quentin Anciaux fucking a horse is 100% and the probability of Quentin Anciaux fucking a mule is 100%; but if I say "I bet it was a mule not a horse that Quentin Anciaux fucked" I will win my bet 50% of the time. John K Clark -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
