Le 23 juil. 2015 17:58, "John Clark" <[email protected]> a écrit : > > > On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 Quentin Anciaux <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > >> No he did not. He >> [Quentin means John Clark. I think] >> pretends probabilities do have meaning in MWI. When he says 0.5 with his bet > > Actually John Clark "pretends" that half the John Clark's who say "I bet Quentin Anciaux will see spin up when the electron is measured" will win the bet.
Actually John Clark can say the same thing betting that after duplication he will find moscow behind the door, and about half the time he will be right. And round and round we go. Granted there will be mathematical problems if there are an infinite number of John Clarks and not just 10^500^500 of them, but that is a difficulty that the many worlds theory has never entirely cleared up in my opinion. Yes it needs work but I still think the theory is on the right track. > > John K Clark > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
