On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 9:35 PM, Bruce Kellett <bhkell...@optusnet.com.au> wrote:
> On 24/06/2016 3:32 am, Bruno Marchal wrote: > >> >> Of course, like Bohm, you can assume that there are particles, and >> conspiratorial potential, but that looks like Ptolemeaus epicycles, and >> worst, they prevent the computationalist theory of consciousness to apply. >> Scientists don't do that. Only blind believers do. >> > > Bohmian mechanics is just pure Schrödinger wave equation -- simply > interpreted in a slightly different way from Everett. In fact, it is > generally recognized that Bohmian mechanics is equivalent to a many worlds > interpretation. (Another illustration of the fact that non-locality is > inherent in QM -- not even Everett avoids non-locality.) > > > Bohmian mechanics is many worlds, with the added assumption that only one of the branches is "really real" (as dictated by the pilot wave). All the others are still there, but everyone in them is supposed to be a philosophical zombie. Jason -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
