On 2/28/2018 3:38 AM, Telmo Menezes wrote:
So what do you find more convincing: An axiomatic proof that God exists,
e.g. St Anslem's or Goedel's. or The mere empirical absence of evidence.
In these proves, God = Totality / Ultimate Reality / The Whole
Shebang. They don't mention commandments, or talking snakes or burning
bushes. I think you are proposing a false equivalence.
No, you are inserting one. St Anselm proves that perfect being/agent
exists. He didn't claim to prove any other mythology. So the question
stands: Who ya gonna believe? the axiomatic proof or your lyin' eyes?
Brent
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
