Oh, but it does -- NOT in the sense of being able to send messages, but in the sense of each subsystem being in instantaneous contact with the other. To avoid this unpleasant, enigmatic result, the description used is "influence". Gotta luv it. AG > > But, contrary to what you said, only Bruce has tried to show that we keep > some influence at a distance in Everett, but convince nobody, and his > “Everett interpretation” used a notion of “world” which has been shown > inconsistent already with Mechanism. > > > So much the worse for mechanism. I imagine that you see yourself as living > in a "world"; and that that world has a set of relatively consistent > properties. Abolish that notion and life suddenly becomes very difficult > indeed! > > > but once again he just said he already proved that was not true > > ? > > Never said that. On the contrary I have always referred, for this non > locality question in Everett, to either Deustch and Hayden paper, or > Tipler’s paper, or Price Webpage https://www.hedweb.com/manworld.htm > > > Your authorities are terminally flawed, as I have repeatedly shown. If you > can't recall the refutations of these silly papers, then look in the > archives! > > Bruce > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to firstname.lastname@example.org. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.