*Come back when you can explain "instantaneous influence". No one can explain it, and neither can you. BTW, I never * * claimed information can be transferred FTL, just "influences", like just about everyone who thinks about the subject. But what is an "influence"? I submit you have no clue. AG* > > *Why do you post the obvious in an excuse for a rebuttal? -- that no > information is transferred -- when you KNOW what we're discussing; namely, > that there appears to be an "influence" (for lack of a better word) that is > transferred INSTANTANEOUSLY. You're the one in denial, not me. AG* > > >> You're like the person who says, "Now it's momentum has changed from an >> unknowable indefinite value to an unknowable definite value. It's >> witchcraft!" >> > > Your problem is that you imagine that you perfectly understand the > Newtonian world view. It's like water to a fish for you. But space and > time are themselves unexplained. > *I don't imagine anything of the sort. AG * > > *As for the Newtonian conservation laws, IIRC they're provable based on > Newton's laws of motion and don't challenge our current understanding of > space-time. AG * > > > What "understanding of spacetime"? > *Ideas like particles or events can be spatially and temporally separated, or not. Is this the first time you've heard this idea? AG * > That understanding is no more than facility in using it to make > predictions. > *It's more than that. It's the world, wherein we exist. See above. AG * > > Brent > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to email@example.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.