On Sunday, December 23, 2018 at 5:20:57 AM UTC-6, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
>
> On 21 Dec 2018, at 11:06, Philip Thrift <[email protected] <javascript:>> 
> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Friday, December 21, 2018 at 3:18:26 AM UTC-6, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 20 Dec 2018, at 14:49, Philip Thrift <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>
>> The psychical (experiential) states of matter (brain) 
>>
>>
>> Why a brain? If matter can be conscious, what is the role of the 
>> (non-digital) brain?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> are the real constituents (psychicals) of consciousness. The 
>> brain-as-computer operates with psychicals as a Turing-machine operates 
>> with symbols. 
>>
>>
>> I don’t understand. To be sure, I have no idea at all of this could work. 
>> Please try to explain like you would explain this to a kid. Up to now, I 
>> see only a magical use of word.
>>
>> For a logician, a theory works when you can substitute any words by any 
>> words. Maybe use the axiomatic presentation, with f_i for the functional 
>> symbols, and R_i for the relation symbols. If not, it is hard to see if 
>> there is a theory, or just idea-associations.
>>
>> Bruno 
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> Whether psychicals (*experiential states*) go down to, say insects, 
> that's one thing scientists are studying:
>
>     
> https://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/do-insects-have-consciousness-180959484/
>
> Whether they go down to cells, molecules, particles, ... ,that's another 
> thing (the next chapter):
>
>     
> https://www.penguin.co.uk/books/111/1117019/galileo-s-error/9781846046018.html
>
>      
>
> On experiential semantics (for brain-as-computer): The toy example as I've 
> given before is to think of a Turing-type computer, but instead of 
> operating with symbols, it is operating with emojis - but the emojis have 
> actual (material!) realization as experience.
>
>
>
> You lost me. One of my goal is to explain “matter”, and with mechanism, we 
> cannot assume it at the start. Mechanism makes any role for some primary 
> matter being quite magical.
>
> Bruno
>
>
>
>

But the point is: Matter is not *Mechanistic*.
Matter is *Experientialistic*.

That's the whole thing!

- pt

 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to