On 4/22/2019 4:01 PM, Philip Thrift wrote:


On Monday, April 22, 2019 at 4:39:34 PM UTC-5, Brent wrote:



    On 4/22/2019 2:17 PM, Philip Thrift wrote:


    On Monday, April 22, 2019 at 4:08:12 PM UTC-5, Brent wrote:



        On 4/22/2019 1:56 PM, Philip Thrift wrote:

        The Kantian view is that *reality* is actually really real.
        It is there whether there are any of us (or anyone else)
        thinking beings around to agree about or argue about anything.

        Really?


        What people agree (or disagree) about, "intersubjective" or
        otherwise (and it is questionable these days in 2019 what
        agreement there really is) are *theories of reality*.

        Most theories (and all the useful ones) are not theories of
        reality, they are theories of a part of reality, i.e. a
        domain in which the theory makes accurate and reliable
        predictions.

        Brent
        “All human progress has been made by studying the shadows on
        the cave wall.”
           --- Sean Carroll



    Sean is a Platonist. Just like Vic said.

    Have you read the parable of the cave??

    Brent




It's the very definition of Platonism: Platonic Forms.


[Wikipedia: The Allegory of the Cave]

The allegory is probably related to Plato's theory of *Forms*, according to which the "Forms" (or "Ideas"), and not the material world known to us through sensation, possess the highest and most fundamental kind of reality. Only knowledge of the *Forms* constitutes real knowledge or what Socrates considers "the good".


https://faculty.washington.edu/smcohen/320/cave.htm

Plato realizes that the general run of humankind can think, and speak, etc., without (so far as they acknowledge) any awareness of his realm of*Forms*.

The allegory of the cave is supposed to explain this.

In the allegory, Plato likens people untutored in the *Theory of Forms* to prisoners chained in a cave, unable to turn their heads. All they can see is the wall of the cave. Behind them burns a fire. Between the fire and the prisoners there is a parapet, along which puppeteers can walk. The puppeteers, who are behind the prisoners, hold up puppets that cast shadows on the wall of the cave. The prisoners are unable to see these puppets, the real objects, that pass behind them. What the prisoners see and hear are shadows and echoes cast by objects that they do not see.

OK.  You read it.  Maybe you didn't read the quote of Carroll, in which he plainly says the "prisoners" whos pay attention to what they see and make inferences from their observations are the ones that advance knowledge...not the mystics like Plato to who think mere introspection is superior.

Vic would have agreed completely with Carroll on that point.  He called Carroll a Platonist once because Carroll considered quantum fields more fundamental than particles.  I don't think fields vs particles has much to do with Platonism and at other times Vic seemed to agree one was a good as the other.  I (and I think Bob and LC) consider fields more fundamental because particles come and go depending on acceleration and the existence of horizons.

Brent

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to