> On 24 Apr 2019, at 21:28, 'Brent Meeker' via Everything List > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On 4/24/2019 9:51 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote: >> Until we get evidence for some matter (like observing a discrepancy between >> the physics extracted from arithmetic) > > Which is unlikely because no physics is extracted from arithmetic.
Read the second part of the sane04 paper. By reversing Goldblatt’s modal quantum logic, we get three quantum logics. One for each mode of self-reference where some physics can be expected; Just that makes interesting to compare with nature, as if physics appears more in []p & p (p sigma_1), or less ((than []p & <>t or []p & <>t & p), that evaluate a degree of idealism. This explains where physics comes from. Why it is quantum logical, and how consciousness can be related to the physical reality, which is just not aboard by physics, and inconsistent in the physicalist metaphysics, unless it abandons Mechanism (which it does very implicitly). Bruno > > Brent > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Everything List" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
