On Fri, Jul 12, 2024, 7:02 AM John Clark <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Thu, Jul 11, 2024 at 7:01 PM Jason Resch <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >> Who judges if the "phenomenal judgments" of the machine are correct or
>>> incorrect? Even humans can't agree among themselves about most
>>> philosophical matters, certainly that's true of members of this list.
>>>
>>
>> *> They don't have to be correct, as far as I know. The machine just has
>> to make phenomenal judgements (without prior training on such topics).*
>>
>
> The AI's responses don't have to be correct?!  Generating philosophical 
> blather
> about consciousness is the easiest thing in the world because there is
> nothing to work on, there are no facts that the blather must fit. For it to
> rise a little above the level of blather you've got to start with an
> unproven axiom such as "*consciousness is the way data feels when it is
> being processed and thus I am not the only conscious being in the universe*".
>
>
>
>> *> Failing the test doesn't imply a lack of consciousness. But passing
>> the test implies the presence of consciousness.*
>>
>
> So the Argonov Test has the same flaw that the Turing Test has, and is far
> easier to pass. For a computer to pass the Turing Test it must be able to
> converse intelligently, but not too intelligently, ON ANY SUBJECT, but to
> pass the  Argonov Test it only needs to be able to prattle on about
> consciousness.
>
>
> *> there must be a source of information to permit the making of
>> phenomenal judgements, and since the machine was not trained on them, what
>> else, would you propose that source could be, other than consciousness?*
>>
>
> From your questions to the AI. When I meet someone we don't spontaneously
> start talking about consciousness, it only happens when one of us steers
> the conversation into that direction, and that seldom happens (except on
> this list) because usually both of us would rather talk about other things.
>
>

Do you think that passing the Argonov test would constitute positive proof
of consciousness?

Jason



>   See what's on my new list at  Extropolis
> <https://groups.google.com/g/extropolis>
> ubu
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Everything List" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/CAJPayv3QeUwqAay0GfDmXXwySOhQj-%2BBSbfiZcqvMdhGrNq%2BGQ%40mail.gmail.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/CAJPayv3QeUwqAay0GfDmXXwySOhQj-%2BBSbfiZcqvMdhGrNq%2BGQ%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/CA%2BBCJUh%2BkS-i_n3BTVcB%3D92M0VfESR6n_Ua14fYj4aEFMmCQBQ%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to