I haven't seen much response to Richard's post, but I think he captures the 
current reality pretty well. I don't hear many comments about the cars 
appearing to be "just karts with a body", but I hear the rest of it all the 
time. Furthermore, there are so many very cheap FVs and FFs out there on the 
used market that one can buy for the price of a decent used F5 that I think a 
lot of folks end up in those classes kind of by default...affordable and a lot 
more folks to race with, plus none of the perceived downsides of F5. Only at 
the pointy end of FV and FF does one see drivers spending lots of money on 
tires and rebuilds when the motor drops off 2 or 3 hp. The rest of the guys 
just pour gas in the thing and drive it, and are therefore racing just as 
economically as one can in F5. That's a tall order to overcome. Stan

"Richard L. Hensley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I agree that there are several 
changes which would make F500 a more 
attractive class. However, these changes may not improve class 
participation.  The class does not enjoy widespread acceptance for several 
reasons.
Many have the perception from other formula drivers that:
1.)  The cars are too rough to handle due to the limited suspension.
2.)  These are not real cars they are just large karts with a body.
3.)  The exhaust is too noisy and will cause problems with both autocross 
and racing.
4.)  A used FF is a better investment.
5.)  The engines are obsolete and hard to get parts for.
6.)  Two cycle engines are mysterious and hard to maintain.
7.)  Class participation is small.

I just bought an old F500 for FM.  These were the reasons I heard as to why 
I should buy a FF.

We need a better public relations department.

I also personally feel that:
1.)  we need the option to improve handling with longer suspension rubber, 
If we desire.  Apparently the rule            changed between 1992 (max. 1" 
thick compressed) and today (max. 1" thick).
2.)  The use of currently available engine, stock with no modifications, but 
open for repair and rebuilding by anyone.
       A motorcycle engine might be more available than a snowmobile 
powerplant, if it can be adapted to the CVT.
3.)  Retaining the CVT certainly is preferred, in my opinion, but others may 
prefer a sequential gearbox



 
---------------------------------
Finding fabulous fares is fun.
Let Yahoo! FareChase search your favorite travel sites to find flight and hotel 
bargains.
________________________________
FormulaCar Magazine - A Proud Supporter of Formula 500
The Official Publication of Junior Formula Car Racing
Subscribe Today! www.formulacarmag.com or 519-624-2003
_________________________________



_______________________________________________
F500 mailing list - [email protected]
To unsubscribe or change options please visit:
http://f500.org/mailman/listinfo/f500
*** Please, DO NOT send unsubscribe requests to the mailing list! ***

Reply via email to