adobe has been saying that the next version of flash will be designer-driven so it's maybe something that is being looked at at the moment
On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 6:22 PM, daniele tassone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Double click on the component/botton and auto-creation of AS3 code is other > solution > in order to keep good code and good humor for people that don't want to > write code; > > 3 weeks ago i have explain at creative team that will work with me, how we > can work > togheter with as3; not happy to see that we can't use event on Button. > > Next week other lesson at different creative team in order to explain same > things. > I'll hear the same word: loadMovie ? event ? > > I don't want to speak bad about AS3, I think that is a good language/ide, > with a little bit of problem because it's young. > > But i hope that Adobe can give the right way in order to do more and better > with low work. > Adobe have great experience in designer-tool-market, I'll hope for the > future. > > Daniele Tassone > > > > 2008/7/18 allandt bik-elliott (thefieldcomic.com) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > i think someone has touched on it before, but if there is to be code > > applicable to movieclips / buttons on stage then they should work > similarly > > to the way motion tweens can be copied as actionscript - allow the bad > > behaviour for numpties and quick jobs, but then compensate to move the > code > > to where it should be. > > > > a > > > > On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 4:36 PM, Juan Pablo Califano < > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > You're probably right. Nevertheless, I think the spirit of the article > > has > > > been misunderstood. As I read it, it pointed out the need to have a > > > higher-level visual-style user interface to make simple things easier > for > > > non programmers. Visual tools that can intuitively generate the AS 3 > code > > > for adding simple behaviours and interactivity. I'm a programmer > myself > > > and > > > I don't think I'd use these features, but I now many people I work with > > who > > > would love to have them available. It'd make their lives easier, > without > > > compromising efficency or mantainability (we're talking about simple > > stuff > > > anyway). I believe the "charges" about button events, getURL and > > > loadMovie are a good example of this point. > > > > > > Cheers > > > Juan Pablo Califano > > > > > > > > > 2008/7/18, Abe Pazos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > > > > I think most of the people who would agree > > > > with these charges are not in this mailing list. > > > > > > > > Are there more AS3 coders out there? > > > > Or more designers who sometimes use > > > > a line or two of ActionScript with gotoAndPlays, > > > > loadMovies, on release/rollover/rollout? > > > > > > > > I wonder how would this discussion look > > > > like if this was a designers mailing list? > > > > > > > > Abe > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > Flashcoders mailing list > > > > Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com > > > > http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Flashcoders mailing list > > > Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com > > > http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Flashcoders mailing list > > Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com > > http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders > > > _______________________________________________ > Flashcoders mailing list > Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com > http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders > _______________________________________________ Flashcoders mailing list Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
