On Sun, Jan 30, 2000 at 02:10:33AM +0000, Nick Lamb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "duplicate the palette file parser" rather overstates the problem, if

You picked probably the least important problem :(

> Then you open a dialog which says 'Sorry about this old chap, but
> I'm afraid you'll have to click "Refresh" in the poorly designed
> Palette Edit dialog, we promise to make this less evil in a future
> incarnation of the Gimp'. All done.

Yes, thats not "easy to do", its more like "broken by design".

> I happen to think that the above is better than admitting defeat and
> saying "We can't do that AT ALL".

We still can't do that from a plug-in, there is no point in arguing about

> hacking exercise to (you will accept it if they write it Marc, right?)

With accept you mean "put into the distribution"? I surely have accepted
much worse hackery in the past ;->

      -----==-                                             |
      ----==-- _                                           |
      ---==---(_)__  __ ____  __       Marc Lehmann      +--
      --==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ /       [EMAIL PROTECTED] |e|
      -=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\       XX11-RIPE         --+
    The choice of a GNU generation                       |

Reply via email to