Hi,
On 2016-01-10 17:06, staedtler-przyborski wrote:
Am 09.01.2016 um 23:25 schrieb coadde:
I've been thinking a lot about a solution for it
Luckily I had a talk with the project-leader of Iconic Communication
(http://iconicom.univie.ac.at/home/) Aglaja Przyborski also Publisher
(together with others) of
'Dokumentarische Bildinterpretation: Methodologie und Forschungspraxis
(Sozialwissenschaftliche Ikonologie: Qualitative Bild- und
Videointerpretation)'
http://www.amazon.de/Dokumentarische-Bildinterpretation-Forschungspraxis-Sozialwissenschaftliche-Videointerpretation/dp/3847401106/ref=sr_1_5?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1452440781&sr=1-5.
She understood immediately the problem of the lack of a 'meta-icon'.
As expert she recommended the usage of 4 different smileys in one
image. I try to realize Aglaja's (you remember, one of the three
Graces) idea (just to raise another tempest in a teapot ;-)).
Isn't it similar then to my idea (in the bug report) of 2 (or 3, or 4
even if that's really possible!) different "Wilber" in one image? Wilber
being our Software icon, it is a good representation of an icon. Having
2 or 3 of them, with different designs, in a single icons can mean
"changing the icon theme".
And it may be more representative (IMHO) than "smileys" which don't
fully represent icons.
Just saying. :-)
Jehan
