Daniel Hauck (dan...@yacg.com) wrote:
> Nice spin.
What spin? You claimed that "querty" (you probbly mean qwerty btw.) was
designed to be inefficient, when in fact it was designed for a faster
Who is doing the spin here?
Sure, without the cumbersome mechanics there are better and faster
methods, but that does not change the intent behind the design of
QWERTY. What was your point again?
gimp-user-list mailing list
List address: email@example.com
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list