Daniel Hauck (dan...@yacg.com) wrote: > Nice spin. What spin? You claimed that "querty" (you probbly mean qwerty btw.) was designed to be inefficient, when in fact it was designed for a faster typing speed.
Who is doing the spin here? Sure, without the cumbersome mechanics there are better and faster methods, but that does not change the intent behind the design of QWERTY. What was your point again? Bye, Simon -- si...@budig.de http://simon.budig.de/ _______________________________________________ gimp-user-list mailing list List address: email@example.com List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list