Daniel Hauck (dan...@yacg.com) wrote:
> But if you answer Querty, you lose because the world knows querty
> was inefficient by design

May I quote Wikipedia?

"Contrary to popular belief, the QWERTY layout was not designed to
slow the typist down, but rather to speed up typing by preventing
jams. (There is also evidence that, aside from the issue of
jamming, keys being further apart increases typing speed on its own,
because it encourages alternation between the hands."

The whole discussion suffers from "well known facts" being pulled out of
thin air, and this is not a single bit different.

Bye,
        Simon
-- 
              si...@budig.de              http://simon.budig.de/
_______________________________________________
gimp-user-list mailing list
List address:    gimp-user-list@gnome.org
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
List archives:   https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list

Reply via email to