Though many people think that Overloading/Overwriting and JSNI don't
really fit together.
I think they do if you are a bit creative.

If you are interested in how I solved this problem for QxWT you should
take a look at this series of posts.

[1]http://tomsondev.bestsolution.at/2010/01/05/background-to-qxwt-and-gwt-generator-integration/
[2]http://tomsondev.bestsolution.at/2010/01/10/qxwt-explained-part-2/
[3]http://tomsondev.bestsolution.at/2010/01/12/qxwt-explained-part-3/
[4]http://tomsondev.bestsolution.at/2010/01/15/qxwt-explained-part-4/

The overloading/overwriting use case is discussed in [3]. I have no
deeper insights in SmartGWT but I guess writing something like this is
possible for their set of widgets as well (Probably one can extract
the code I've written for QxWT and make it useable to any JSNI-Wrapper
and even improve the functionality e.g. calling back to JavaScript
without writing any line of code, ... a rather advanced example can be
found here [5]).

BTW QxWT is completely free - everything is dual licensed under EPL and LGPL.

Tom

[5]https://svn.tomsondev.com/svn/ufacekit/qx/org.ufacekit.qx.viewers/src/main/java/org/ufacekit/qx/viewers/internal/TreeDataCellRenderer.java

On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 2:44 PM, Tercio <[email protected]> wrote:
>>    - Both GXT and Smart GWT are pure gwt (no underlying native JS library,
>>    so expect equivalent speed/performance from the GWT compiler).
>
> Nope, SmartGWT is a wrapper to SmartClient JS Library.
>
>
> ckendrick and I have different understandings about override ... :-P
> We already discussed this some time ago ...
>
> SmartGWT you can't override it's functionality, just it's behavior.
>
> SmartGWT is more feature rich than GXT, but I don't like their
> licensing terms, I prefer GXT one, not only because the price, but the
> features, we just need a UI framework, the server we already have one.
>
> Regards.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Google Web Toolkit" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.

Reply via email to