My poser was as simple as this: Where was fascism in criticising (individual(s) , parties, or whatever)? Another related question: Where is the 'difference' between criticism for silence and soliciting the help of the cultural elites in this issue? (when being silent almost borders culpability or at least half way to that on their part, in this particular case, I beieve..) StillI ,I can understand your not accepting my position. What I would object,however, is calling me a fascist for the simple act my criticism. Strangely enough, you don't need to be substantial here,in your accusation. Further, you refuse to examine the substantials in your opponents' criticism; and some of your defenders (strangely, again) try to invoke questions of propriety in dialogue. My understanding of casteism and brahmanism is much helped by this kind of behaviour in a dialogue. At the same time, let me add that this may please not be mistaken for calling you or others names, even in the wildest of my imaginations.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ greenyouth mailinglist is the activist support mailinglist for kerala To post to this group, send email to [email protected] -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
