Yes, and authenticating users to log onto nodes would constitute "vetting / hosting" correct?
-Zack On Mon, 28 Jul 2003, Zephyr Teachout wrote: > Not quite! DFA is planning on running Deanster. We're just not vetting > nodes or hosting them. No reason we can't link to them, map them, and > push them (much like we do w/dean directory). We're just not > controlling, directing, or hosting them. > > Z > > Zephyr Teachout > Internet Organizing & Outreach > Dean for America > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Meetup at http://www.deanforamerica.com/meetup > Get local at http://action.deanforamerica.com > Contribute at http://www.deanforamerica.com/contribute > > > -----Original Message----- > From: zachary rosen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, July 28, 2003 12:07 PM > To: Joshua Koenig > Cc: Ka-Ping Yee; Jon Lebkowsky; Zephyr Teachout; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [hackers] Privacy control for profiles > > > On Mon, 28 Jul 2003, Joshua Koenig wrote > > Deanster could also act as a (Jabber/Drupal) single-sign-on point for > > any Drupal Dean Nodes a Deanster also frequents. > > We talked about this with Zephyr, and the deal is - if DFA run Deanster > then it cannot handle Authentication for the Nodes or they would have to > be vetted by DFA (ie official) so I don't think this is possible. > > -Zack >