Yes, and authenticating users to log onto nodes would constitute
"vetting / hosting" correct?

-Zack

On Mon, 28 Jul 2003, Zephyr Teachout wrote:

> Not quite! DFA is planning on running Deanster. We're just not vetting
> nodes or hosting them. No reason we can't link to them, map them, and
> push them (much like we do w/dean directory). We're just not
> controlling, directing, or hosting them.
>
> Z
>
> Zephyr Teachout
> Internet Organizing & Outreach
> Dean for America
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Meetup at http://www.deanforamerica.com/meetup
> Get local at http://action.deanforamerica.com
> Contribute at http://www.deanforamerica.com/contribute
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: zachary rosen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, July 28, 2003 12:07 PM
> To: Joshua Koenig
> Cc: Ka-Ping Yee; Jon Lebkowsky; Zephyr Teachout; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [hackers] Privacy control for profiles
>
>
> On Mon, 28 Jul 2003, Joshua Koenig wrote
> > Deanster could also act as a (Jabber/Drupal) single-sign-on point for
> > any Drupal Dean Nodes a Deanster also frequents.
>
> We talked about this with Zephyr, and the deal is - if DFA run Deanster
> then it cannot handle Authentication for the Nodes or they would have to
> be vetted by DFA (ie official) so I don't think this is possible.
>
> -Zack
>

Reply via email to