You have to remember though, that's before NAT became prevalent. There are way more computers right now than there are IPv4 addresses, it's just that we have private networks using NAT which reduces the number of "real" IPs needed for that network down to 1.
This is one of the primary reasons, it seems, that ISPs and others are dragging their feet with IPv6 implementation; Because "we have enough" addresses and it would be expensive for them to do. On 5/10/2010 4:25 PM, Cc2iscooL wrote: > I remember when they said we'd be using IPv6 years ago because we'd have run > out of addresses. > > I guess not. :P > > _______________________________________________ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please > visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > _______________________________________________ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
