2007/9/6, Robert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>   > Just to make sure I understand. Connecting pins to an internal layer
> > using vias and then filling the plane is not recognized as a
> > connection by the connection tool. Is that right? If so, how do I
> > know if there are missing connections to the plane?
>
> Power planes are a bit of a weak point with KiCAD, and my only major
> bugbear. Obviously the dozens of power nodes will be scattered all
> over the board, and it's a big plus if you can connect them up with
> power planes first. This is especially true of double-sided boards,
> where you need to ensure you don't end up with isolated islands of power
> plane.
>
> With KiCAD you will need to leave connecting the power nodes until last,
> and pray that you spot any isolated islands before it's a real problem
> to connect them again. Then you'll need to hook up the power nodes
> with tracks so the DRC passes. I'm doing that right now on a
> (double-sided) board, and I've elected to use a 5 thou track and 10 thou
> grid to do that, so I can squeeze the connections through all the twists
> and turns the power plane takes.
>
> Regards,
>
> Robert.
>
>

























Hi,

Personally, I do not find that it is really a limitation.

For questions of electromagnetic compatibility, the ground plane is very
important, it should be prevented that connections of GND, which must be
close, are done by turnings.

For that I start by tracing the connections of GND by using a width track
acceptable, thus I have a good vision of netting. Then I trace the other
tracks, the DRC are now correct.
At the end I generate the zones.

Sometimes that needs a few more VIAs on signal tracks.

I obtain this way a layout of good quality on EMI level.

Just my 2 cents...

Regards.

-- 
Danilo Uccelli
CH-2400 Le Locle
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to