Indeed we should, this is already taking embarrasingly long. Do any other
members plan to review the test-wiki content?

2017-07-20 3:58 GMT+02:00 Jay prakash <[email protected]>:

> This is my humble Request to langcom. We can hurry in Discussion. Because
> this taked already long time after creation of task.
>
> On 19-Jul-2017 4:20 pm, "Jay prakash" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Dear Langcom Members,
>>
>>                     As of Hindi points of view the content which already
>> have are very usefull. There are no site on internet which provide this
>> type of information. We already made well written content like Principals
>> of Management and Aerospace Engineering etc. Where the content is much
>> better than English Wikiversity. Because where we describe whats do student
>> after 10+2. You can verify it with third party source. The partialy failure
>> of Eng Wikiversity is that because the many sites host learning content in
>> english. But Hindi Wikiversity will be the only place where native get free
>> knowledge in thier language. I am not say you believe me. You can confirm
>> it with third party.
>>
>> With the respect of time. Hindi Wikiversity will be milestone. Thanks
>>
>> On 19-Jul-2017 10:20 am, "Gerard Meijssen" <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hoi,
>>> People want us to consider the deletion of projects... not happy about
>>> it. The consequence for me is that we also look at Wikiversity as a
>>> project. Is it viable, is it used. What experiences exist with English
>>> Wikipedia ?
>>> Thanks,
>>>      GerardM
>>>
>>> On 19 July 2017 at 03:35, MF-Warburg <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> StevenJ81 informed me that most of the pages are only in <
>>>> https://beta.wikiversity.org/wiki/Category:%E0%A4%B5%E0%A5%
>>>> 88%E0%A4%95%E0%A4%B2%E0%A5%8D%E0%A4%AA%E0%A4%BF%E0%A4%95_HI>, for
>>>> whatever reason (>400). So I looked at them as well.
>>>>
>>>> With this "full picture", it looks much better. Not stellar, but
>>>> well... the project is active and continues to be edited (and, I guess,
>>>> improved).
>>>> Now my opinion is that we should carry on with the approval.
>>>>
>>>> 2017-07-19 1:21 GMT+02:00 MF-Warburg <[email protected]>:
>>>>
>>>>> I have now looked through the Hindi pages on Beta.wikiversity myself.
>>>>> At first I just wanted to look at a random sample of pages, but then I
>>>>> noticed that there are only "69 pages (including categories, templates,
>>>>> talk pages, and redirects)" (cf. catanalysis). I don't know if this number
>>>>> was higher previously.
>>>>> However, that is IMHO way too little for a wiki to be approved. I also
>>>>> don't see any pages that look like courses, which after all, is what
>>>>> Wikiversity is for.
>>>>>
>>>>> Therefore I agree with the starting point of this thread, that Hindi
>>>>> Wikiversity should not be created, and the approval taken back.
>>>>>
>>>>> 2017-07-19 1:09 GMT+02:00 MF-Warburg <[email protected]>:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes, agreed. Though the question here is different, it is about
>>>>>> whether the test-project as it currently is is in a state that is
>>>>>> appropriate for approval.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2017-07-18 12:51 GMT+02:00 Jon Harald Søby <[email protected]>:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> (Late reply, sorry.)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> While I may have doubts about the merits of Wikiversity myself, I
>>>>>>> don't think it's within the scope of the Language Committee to deny the
>>>>>>> creation of projects based on those merits. We should only focus on 
>>>>>>> whether
>>>>>>> the community for the relevant language edition of a project is healthy
>>>>>>> enough for it to become a separate project, without consideration for 
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> individual committee members' feelings about the project as a whole.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 2017-07-04 18:12 GMT+02:00 Gerard Meijssen <
>>>>>>> [email protected]>:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hoi,
>>>>>>>> Yes, that is the politically correct answer. The question asked by
>>>>>>>> several is what is Wikiversity good for. Is it actually used?
>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>      GerardM
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 4 July 2017 at 18:06, Satdeep Gill <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I do think that the community will improve content as the time
>>>>>>>>> progresses. The community has been working hard on translation as 
>>>>>>>>> well.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> But I do see some pages which are not written well and contain
>>>>>>>>> machine translations. Such as
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> <http://goog_1512637911>
>>>>>>>>> https://beta.wikiversity.org/wiki/%E0%A4%90%E0%A4%B0%E0%A5%8
>>>>>>>>> B%E0%A4%B8%E0%A5%8D%E0%A4%AA%E0%A5%87%E0%A4%B8_%E0%A4%87%E0%
>>>>>>>>> A4%82%E0%A4%9C%E0%A4%BF%E0%A4%A8%E0%A5%80%E0%A4%AF%E0%A4%B0%
>>>>>>>>> E0%A4%BF%E0%A4%82%E0%A4%97
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>>> Satdeep Gill
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Strategy Coordinator, Wikimedia Foundation
>>>>>>>>> <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Strategy/Wikimedia_movement/2017/Track_B#SGill_.28WMF.29>
>>>>>>>>> Co-founder, Punjabi Wikimedians
>>>>>>>>> <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Punjabi_Wikimedians>
>>>>>>>>> Treasurer, Affiliations Committee
>>>>>>>>> <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Affiliations_Committee>
>>>>>>>>> Member, Language Committee
>>>>>>>>> <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Language_committee>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 25 June 2017 at 01:08, Jay prakash <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> [https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/Computer_graphics/2013-2014
>>>>>>>>>> /Page_footer]
>>>>>>>>>> See Here.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 6/25/17, Mahir Morshed <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> > Well, the part in [brackets] was "the lack of effort to even
>>>>>>>>>> localize the
>>>>>>>>>> > comments in the code samples" and I did mention that it was
>>>>>>>>>> being addressed
>>>>>>>>>> > slowly. My apologies for failing to provide a direct link to an
>>>>>>>>>> example.
>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>> > I also now see that the email address is in fact yours. I am
>>>>>>>>>> not sure that
>>>>>>>>>> > there is any precedent elsewhere for such byline templates on
>>>>>>>>>> other
>>>>>>>>>> > Wikimedia projects.
>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>> > On Sat, Jun 24, 2017 at 2:19 PM, Jay prakash <
>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>> >> You are showing it that you will not see all those links which
>>>>>>>>>> I have
>>>>>>>>>> >> cleaned like it [https://beta.wikiversity.org/wiki/कंप्यूटर
>>>>>>>>>> >> ग्राफिक्स/2013-14/जीओजीएल-टेम्पलेट].
>>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>>> >> On 6/25/17, Mahir Morshed <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> >> > To piggyback on what Justin is saying (and also via
>>>>>>>>>> Phabricator:
>>>>>>>>>> >> > https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T168765#3376191):
>>>>>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>>>>>> >> > I am not a Hindi speaker, but I can at least discern
>>>>>>>>>> Devanagari text
>>>>>>>>>> >> > and
>>>>>>>>>> >> > the English loanwords in it. Justin's first link is to
>>>>>>>>>> >> > "Category:Intelligence" with subcategory "Artificial
>>>>>>>>>> intelligence". His
>>>>>>>>>> >> > second link (Computer Programming/IDE/Visual Basic .NET/...)
>>>>>>>>>> bears only
>>>>>>>>>> >> > a
>>>>>>>>>> >> > link to a Japanese online IDE. His third link (Computer
>>>>>>>>>> >> > Graphics/2013-2014/"Page Foot", a page footer which is
>>>>>>>>>> transcluded
>>>>>>>>>> >> > elsewhere) has an email address prefixed with a link to
>>>>>>>>>> >> > @Jayprakash12345
>>>>>>>>>> >> > <https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/p/Jayprakash12345/>'s
>>>>>>>>>> >> userpage--maybe it
>>>>>>>>>> >> > is his own email address?
>>>>>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>>>>>> >> > The problems of most pages only consisting of source code is
>>>>>>>>>> indeed
>>>>>>>>>> >> > inherited from the English Wikiversity courses to which the
>>>>>>>>>> pages are
>>>>>>>>>> >> > linked. Nevertheless, from seeing at least [the lack of
>>>>>>>>>> effort to even
>>>>>>>>>> >> > localize the comments in the code samples], and perhaps from
>>>>>>>>>> seeing the
>>>>>>>>>> >> > lack of something more substantial in the way of content
>>>>>>>>>> revolving
>>>>>>>>>> >> > around
>>>>>>>>>> >> > those code samples, and perhaps more so from Jayprakash12345
>>>>>>>>>> being the
>>>>>>>>>> >> only
>>>>>>>>>> >> > consistent contributor going back at least a month, I must
>>>>>>>>>> thus agree
>>>>>>>>>> >> with
>>>>>>>>>> >> > his assessment that opening hiwikiversity would be a
>>>>>>>>>> disaster. My
>>>>>>>>>> >> personal
>>>>>>>>>> >> > opinion is that other Hindi projects (such as hiwikisource
>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>> >> hiwikiquote)
>>>>>>>>>> >> > could be populated more easily and meaningfully at this
>>>>>>>>>> point, but I
>>>>>>>>>> >> would
>>>>>>>>>> >> > digress to elaborate on that and the whole process of site
>>>>>>>>>> requests
>>>>>>>>>> >> > more
>>>>>>>>>> >> > generally here.
>>>>>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>>>>>> >> > (Edits since the original comment was made: It appears
>>>>>>>>>> judging from
>>>>>>>>>> >> > https://beta.wikiversity.org/wiki/Special:RecentChangesLinke
>>>>>>>>>> d/Category:
>>>>>>>>>> >> HI
>>>>>>>>>> >> > that 1) the subcategory "Artificial intelligence" has been
>>>>>>>>>> deleted and
>>>>>>>>>> >> > 2)
>>>>>>>>>> >> > the part in [brackets] above is being addressed slowly.)
>>>>>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>>>>>> >> > On Sat, Jun 24, 2017 at 1:23 PM, Justin Anthony Knapp
>>>>>>>>>> >> > <[email protected]
>>>>>>>>>> >> >> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>>>>>> >> >> Via Phabricator (https://phabricator.wikimedia
>>>>>>>>>> .org/T168765#3376166):
>>>>>>>>>> >> >>
>>>>>>>>>> >> >> Is this really ready? I don't read Hindi but the main
>>>>>>>>>> category has 84
>>>>>>>>>> >> >> subcategories and 25 are empty (many only have
>>>>>>>>>> subcategories which are
>>>>>>>>>> >> >> themselves empty, such as https://beta.wikiversity.org/
>>>>>>>>>> >> >> wiki/Category:इंटेलिजेंस) There are 578 pieces of content,
>>>>>>>>>> many of
>>>>>>>>>> >> >> which
>>>>>>>>>> >> >> are just one or two lines, such as
>>>>>>>>>> https://beta.wikiversity.org/
>>>>>>>>>> >> >> wiki/कंप्यूटर_प्रोग्रामिंग/IDE/विजुअल_बेसिक_.नेट/Online/Free
>>>>>>>>>> or
>>>>>>>>>> >> >> https://beta.wikiversity.org/w
>>>>>>>>>> iki/कंप्यूटर_ग्राफिक्स/2013-2014/पेज_फ़ुट
>>>>>>>>>> >> >> which is mostly someone's personal email address. Remove
>>>>>>>>>> categories
>>>>>>>>>> >> >> and
>>>>>>>>>> >> >> erroneously-categorized userpages and that becomes 490.
>>>>>>>>>> This includes
>>>>>>>>>> >> >> almost 100 pages which are part of some Linux code such as
>>>>>>>>>> >> >> https://beta.wikiversity.org/w
>>>>>>>>>> iki/लिनक्स/linux-0.01.tar/boot/boot.s.
>>>>>>>>>> >> >> Remove *those* and it's 401 which includes purely cosmetic
>>>>>>>>>> templates
>>>>>>>>>> >> >> and
>>>>>>>>>> >> >> pages like
>>>>>>>>>> >> >> https://beta.wikiversity.org/w
>>>>>>>>>> iki/Portal:Engineering/box-footer.
>>>>>>>>>> >> >> The actual amount of content seems like something that one
>>>>>>>>>> person
>>>>>>>>>> >> >> could
>>>>>>>>>> >> >> make over a long weekend. How is this supposed to be a live
>>>>>>>>>> project?
>>>>>>>>>> >> This
>>>>>>>>>> >> >> seems like a misstep.
>>>>>>>>>> >> >>
>>>>>>>>>> >> >> Creating a new project is a big responsibility and with 500
>>>>>>>>>> pages in
>>>>>>>>>> >> five
>>>>>>>>>> >> >> and a half years? And most of them are either copy-pasted
>>>>>>>>>> Linux code
>>>>>>>>>> >> >> or
>>>>>>>>>> >> >> one
>>>>>>>>>> >> >> line long? That is not a thriving community. This is a
>>>>>>>>>> recipe for
>>>>>>>>>> >> >> disaster.
>>>>>>>>>> >> >>
>>>>>>>>>> >> >> --JAK
>>>>>>>>>> >> >> --
>>>>>>>>>> >> >> "[Icarus] glances up and is caught, wondrously tunneling
>>>>>>>>>> into that hot
>>>>>>>>>> >> >> eye. Who cares that he fell back to the sea?"
>>>>>>>>>> >> >>
>>>>>>>>>> >> >> Viva Western Sahara, viva West Papua
>>>>>>>>>> >> >>
>>>>>>>>>> >> >> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>> >> >> Langcom mailing list
>>>>>>>>>> >> >> [email protected]
>>>>>>>>>> >> >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
>>>>>>>>>> >> >>
>>>>>>>>>> >> >>
>>>>>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>>>>>> >> > --
>>>>>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>>> >> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>> >> Langcom mailing list
>>>>>>>>>> >> [email protected]
>>>>>>>>>> >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
>>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>> > --
>>>>>>>>>> > Yours sincerely,
>>>>>>>>>> > Mahir Morshed
>>>>>>>>>> > University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
>>>>>>>>>> > B.S. Computer Engineering, May 2019
>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>> Langcom mailing list
>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>> Langcom mailing list
>>>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> Langcom mailing list
>>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> mvh
>>>>>>> Jon Harald Søby
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> Langcom mailing list
>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Langcom mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Langcom mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
>>>
>>>
> _______________________________________________
> Langcom mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
>
>
_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom

Reply via email to